Phoenex wrote:

> 
> Question: In previous speed tests? It was used ISAAC? Or ISSAC64?
> It seems to me that was used to ISSAC.
> Also, KISS is different from KISS64.
> I would like to see the tests of speed compared only with the the algor
ithms:
> 
> KISS64
	That's the one I used.

> ALVO ( (int) Like the original idea )
	Since we've seen that the results vary widely from platform to 
platform, I believe that it is interesting to look at several 
implementations. Note that the mathematical formula you gave in your 
first post corresponds with the "floor" implementation. I have no 
idea what exactly the TurboBasic "INT" function does and what's the 
closest C equivalent.

> ISSAC64
	No idea. I took Warp's implementation as is, so I don't know if 
it's ISAAC or ISSAC64.

		Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeb### [at] freefr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)