Warp wrote:
> Chambers <Ben### [at] gmailcom_no_underscores> wrote:
>> The only way to support this is to use nonlinear lines.  It would 
>> certainly allow some interesting distortions, but I'm not sure how 
>> useful it would be in general when isosurfaces already give us 
>> equivalent functionality.
> 
>   Isosurfaces don't really give equivalent functionality because you can't
> model everything with isosurfaces.

To clarify: Isosurfaces give us equivalent functionality to the original 
nonlinear scaling request.

Other than that, I'd be interested in hearing what finite primitives 
cannot be modeled with isosurfaces?

(And the only reason you can't model an infinite primitive is because it 
must be bound by a finite shape).

-- 
Chambers

Post a reply to this message