Kenneth <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Hmm, seems that we're communicating from different universes, in different
> languages. Methinks that you should re-read this entire post; my requests are
> plain to see (if possibly unattainable.) I sense that you're trying to present
> some kind of obtuse 'logical' argument in response to those--based (so it
> seems) on the single idea of 'What color *should* appear at a surface when
> there's no logical answer?' rather than any practical solution or argument to a
> practical question. So be it. (I *do* understand the logical problem of which
> color POV-Ray should choose at a surface; however, you seem to have latched
> onto that as your one-and-only argument to pursue here, sidestepping just about
> everything else that I've tried to ask or explain. That's rather...odd, IMO.) I
> have no answer to your argument; debating deep questions of logic I will leave
> to others.

  You seem to think for some reason that I'm arguing just for the sake of
argument. That's not the case.

  I'm directly asking you: In the case of overlapping objects, which color
should be shown in the overlapping part?

  You have *not* answered this question in any way. The only thing you have
said is that showing the average of the objects is "wrong" and that this
"problem" should be fixed, without specifying exactly how it should be
fixed.

  Why is it so difficult to give a simple and straightforward answer to
a simple and straightforward question?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message