|
 |
http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2009/05/09/1-2-1.aspx
Heh. I hadn't even noticed it was from MSDN until I pasted the link. This is
why source code makes for a bad standard. :-) It's interesting to read some
of the comments and see the arguments for interpreting MS as evil there. I'd
rather have a standard for prose documents that says "flag indicates
obsolete word-break required" than a standard for spreadsheets that doesn't
say what a formula looks like. That seems just kind of weird. The thing
lots of people forget is that MS has money, and open source groups generally
don't, so CYA happens a lot less with open source.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |