On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:30:08 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 14 May 2009 14:11:58 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Sure, but at the same time, RAH is a pretty good concert hall, so even
>>the cheap seats will be able to hear things without too much trouble.
> 
> Well it must be a different RAH that I know. I think that the acoustics
> are pretty poor. Too many reflections, even with the mushrooms on the
> ceiling. :(

Well, in fairness, I've never actually been there, but I've heard it 
described as good.

Maybe it takes a large crowd to get it sounding right?

Jim

Post a reply to this message