Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Warp, this wasn't a practical idea in and of itself. Just a "Lets do 
> this and see if it can be done" kind of thing.

  If that was the goal, it's kind of a stupid goal. Of course it can be
done. Why couldn't it be done? Does C++.net impose some limitations that
would stop it from working?

  AFAIK C++.net purely *adds* to the language. It doesn't remove anything.
So why couldn't it be done?

> It gives no benefit, 
> except to say "See? The .NET runtime is fast enough to run Quake!"

  It's not the .net runtime which is running the program. The program is
calling the .net runtime for some things (most artificially, without any
real good reason, for all I can see).

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message