>> Really? And what makes you think that? OpenGL with hardware 
>> acceleration is equally fast if you call it from C or Haskell. :-P
> 
> The original quake was not OpenGL... :) Though, they did release GLQuake.

You're probably right. I never saw it. (I only saw Quake II. For that 
matter, I've never seen Quake III, although I'm told it exists.)

Of course, nobody has ever implemented Quake in Haskell. But they *have* 
successfully implemented Doom. (And it loads original Doom "WAD" files.)

> And, isn't Haskell like an order of magnitude slower than ... just about 
> everything else?

I actually can't decide whether you're being serious or not...

Post a reply to this message