|
 |
On 5/9/2009 7:09 PM, somebody wrote:
> "Jim Henderson"<nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:4a063563$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 19:47:35 -0600, somebody wrote:
>>
>>> That's why legitimate users need to support motions for ISP filtering,
>> Absolutely not. Once you get the ISPs in the business of deciding what
>> can and can't be viewed by the public, then you get into legislating
>> morality.
>
> Do you feel the same way about surveillence cameras in stores?
Surveillance cameras in stores are the equivalent of a company
monitoring downloads from their own website.
ISP filtering is more akin to surveillance cameras in your *home*,
making sure you don't have anything illegal there.
> You also need to make it hard for people to violate the law.
I don't think this is necessarily true.
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
