"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> a écrit dans le message de 
news:4a05abba$1@news.povray.org...
> It doesn't have to provide content descriptions to make them usable, is my 
> point.   You can have a search engine search content without knowing what 
> that content is or what you're searching for.  That's what the bloom 
> filters give you.

I still don't understand how that would protect the owners of the search 
engine from litigation. If a user can get a pointer to get some illegal 
content, the party that provided the pointer can be found liable, at least 
if they didn't show due diligence in cleaning up their 
index/tracker/whatever. How would your system work in practice (from a user 
point of view) ?

G.

Post a reply to this message