|
 |
On Sat, 09 May 2009 20:09:36 -0600, somebody wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:4a063563$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 19:47:35 -0600, somebody wrote:
>>
>> > That's why legitimate users need to support motions for ISP
>> > filtering,
>>
>> Absolutely not. Once you get the ISPs in the business of deciding what
>> can and can't be viewed by the public, then you get into legislating
>> morality.
>
> Do you feel the same way about surveillence cameras in stores?
You're changing the subject. Surveillance (sic) does not interfere in a
person's activity and is itself a passive activity. Packet filtering
interferes with legitimate traffic and is not a passive activity.
>> Prosecute those who *actually violate the law*.
>
> There's no single easy easy solution. You also need to make it hard for
> people to violate the law.
While we're at it, let's make it illegal to use photocopiers and
scanners, lord knows those are used for illegal activities.
How about we also outlaw cars, since those are used to commit crimes.
In fact, let's outlaw any device or technology that can be used to commit
a crime of any sort.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
