|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
news:4a063563$1@news.povray.org...
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 19:47:35 -0600, somebody wrote:
>
> > That's why legitimate users need to support motions for ISP filtering,
>
> Absolutely not. Once you get the ISPs in the business of deciding what
> can and can't be viewed by the public, then you get into legislating
> morality.
Do you feel the same way about surveillence cameras in stores?
> Prosecute those who *actually violate the law*.
There's no single easy easy solution. You also need to make it hard for
people to violate the law.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |