POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : I haven't read the entire paper yet, but the analogies are rather apt : Re: I haven't read the entire paper yet, but the analogies are ratherapt Server Time
3 Sep 2024 15:15:03 EDT (-0400)
  Re: I haven't read the entire paper yet, but the analogies are ratherapt  
From: andrel
Date: 9 Dec 2010 16:37:20
Message: <4D014C10.7060202@gmail.com>
On 9-12-2010 21:29, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> On 12/9/2010 11:50 AM, Warp wrote:
>> Mike Raiford<"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.maa.org/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf
>>
>> That reminds me vividly of something which I have noticed and realized
>> all by myself: I have never seen *anywhere* the *logical* explanation of
>> how you can easily calculate, for example, the sum of all the integers
>> from 1 to 100. It's *always* just the raw and sterile formula, and that's
>> it. No explanation, no intuitive nor logical way of deducing it. Just the
>> formula and that's it.
>
> I can't say I've had the same experience. I've seen plenty of
> explanations of that formula, probably more so than any equation other
> than the Pythagorean theorem.

mildly related http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd05xx/EWD538.PDF


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.