|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 2-9-2010 14:52, Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 9/2/2010 7:43 AM, Francois Labreque wrote:
>
>> Personally, I like how they hid "Reply all".
>
> Reply-to-all was the worst feature in the entire history of e-mail.
> Rarely is it ever relevant, not only that, but accidentally hitting it
> can have negative consequences, and can clog the network if there were
> lots of people on the send list. Also, If you habitually smack
> reply-to-all, and reply with "Yes, I agree" or "Sign me up" etc.. .it's
> not relative to me, and it annoys me to the nth degree. :)
>
> It does have its place, though. Sometimes what you want to say is
> relevant to all parties involved. Most of the time its not.
There is another place where I find reply to all useful. I bcc every
mail from every e-mail address I use to the same e-mail address. When I
simply reply to that bcc e-mail as a sort of PS because I forgot
something, that mail will only reach myself. Which is useless because I
already knew it.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |