|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 29-3-2010 18:17, Darren New wrote:
> Phil Cook v2 wrote:
>> Depends on the setup. Off the top of my head imagine a situation with
>> a night-guard on reception. The building is locked, but the alarms
>> aren't on. Now if the building can't be locked without the alarms
>> being activated that's a pointless function of the card.
>
> Yes, but that's not the problem. Indeed, that's how it works now.
>
> The problem is that the card unlocks the door but does *not* turn off
> the alarm. The right answer, in other words, is to disallow the card
> from unlocking the door if the alarm is already set. Because as it
> stands now, going into the building sets off the alarm, with no way to
> turn that off.
just do that a couple of times then they have to fix it.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |