On 8-2-2010 21:47, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>> You can compute this quite easily in Haskell:
>>>
>>> ...and yet, an exhaustive analysis of the data quickly demonstrates 
>>> that Andrel was correct in the first place:
>>>
>>> Pr(X > Y) = 2/100
>>> Pr(X = Y) = 1/100
>>> Pr(X < Y) = 0/100
>>>
>>
>> exhaustive analysis? What exhaustive analysis?
> 
> Reading the entire dataset by hand - the brute-force approach. ;-)

Ok, I'll make a note of that. If ever I have the pleasure to interview 
you for a job, I will pull that from my pocket.

Post a reply to this message