On 8-2-2010 20:08, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
>> You can compute this quite easily in Haskell:
>
> ...and yet, an exhaustive analysis of the data quickly demonstrates that
> Andrel was correct in the first place:
>
> Pr(X > Y) = 2/100
> Pr(X = Y) = 1/100
> Pr(X < Y) = 0/100
>
exhaustive analysis? What exhaustive analysis?
Post a reply to this message
|