On 30-1-2010 0:31, Darren New wrote:
> Neeum Zawan wrote:

>>     I'm willing to accept that the test was discriminatory - I just 
>> want to
>> know how. My complaint isn't about the ruling, but the journalism
>> (something everyone who responded seemed to miss).
> 
> I caught it. 

Well I think it was obvious from the subject line that that was your 
point. I didn't react to it because it was handled as if the history was 
common knowledge. I do remember something in the news about the earlier 
ruling and I don't even live there. I felt that a discussion about 
whether the journalist did their work and provided enough information 
would deteriorate into a discussion on what is common knowledge for whom 
and what the intended audience was for that article. (In a round about 
way it did.) As a foreigner, i.e. someone not living in NY (the header 
says "N.Y./Region"), I felt that I had nothing to say on that matter.

Post a reply to this message