|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 26-1-2010 6:48, Neeum Zawan wrote:
> On 01/25/10 11:51, andrel wrote:
>> A couple of remarks:
>> - the judge in our system often catches these things, so it does not
>> mean that a jury system is better. IMO
>
> IMO, that's too much power for a judge to have. At least with a jury,
> you have 12 people vs one with a judge.
All our judges are appointed. Trained to see past layers tricks. They
are assumed to have no link with any political party nor with any
company. I don't know anyone of them that is a public figure. So I think
they are better qualified then me to do justice.
>
>> - I think judges are more likely to catch this than arbitrary citizens
>
> This wasn't a legal issue - so why would a judge be more likely to
> catch this (beyond simply experience with arguments that often arise in
> courts)? He's no more qualified in these matters than an ordinary person
> is.
Experience indeed.
>> - The whole police operation is absolutely illegal here.
>
> You mean stings?
yes.
> I don't have too strong feelings about it. Entrapment,
> though, is something I generally feel should be illegal.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |