|
 |
On 22-1-2010 23:03, Warp wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> On 22-1-2010 21:52, Warp wrote:
>>> I said not to read it, so why did you? Why?
>
>> Because the subject line refers to itself, not the body and you can not
>> parse the subject without reading it?
>
> I was actually referring to the post rather than its subject line.
>
No you didn't. You probably meant to, but that does not count.
Besides you knew what you meant by that title, hence this is the only
reply that you should not reply to. So I assume you are doing this on
purpose... D*mn it make my head hurt all these levels of logical paradoxes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
