On 23-9-2009 22:22, andrel wrote:
> On 23-9-2009 21:02, Warp wrote:
>> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>
>>> Ok I read that wrong. Can you give an algorithm for 'and so on'?
>>
>> "I said it's <n> of <n*2-1>" with consecutive values of n.
>
> where? This formula does not match your problem for n=1.
> Strange bully to incrementally decrease his changes.
> Or am I still not getting it?
Am was indeed not getting it.
Post a reply to this message
|
