On 29-8-2009 14:04, Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>>   That sounds quite shallow. Don't you know that what matters is not the
>> external beauty, but the internal beauty (in other words, what's inside
>> the clothes)?
>>
> 
> Yes, but that's hard to say from photos from the internet. And the
> external beauty plays its part, too. After all that *is* one reason to
> notice the girl at first place.

Actually the face and how somebody dresses are good indications of 
character because that will predict how others will react to that person 
and how they have reacted in the past.

> Actually, "what's inside the clothes" as definition of internal beauty
> sounds... wrong. 

seconded

> That sounds like the key would be the other parts of
> external beauty but head. I've always understood the internal beauty as
> something that's inside the head, ie. world of thoughts. I did write a
> longer story about to the message you replied, but when I red it again
> it was way too badly formed. The main message was that it's the most
> important thing that thoughts are in sync.
> 
> -Aero

Post a reply to this message