|
 |
On 14-8-2009 0:24, somebody wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:4a847bbd$1@news.povray.org...
>
>> Those in favour of continuing private insurance, in my view, overlook
>> that public health is, by definition, a public concern. If we don't take
>> care of individuals who get sick because they don't have insurance, we
>> risk infecting everyone else.
>
> I think people on all sides miss the real issues. Health care doesn't
> magically become better or worse because it's public or private. Health care
> in both USA and Canada stinks, and the latter is public (and arguably stinks
> more, since well to do Canadians rely on USA for their timely health care
> needs). Granted, the private vs public or how much of each is a major
> decision, but the quality is all in the implementation, economy, management,
> logistics... etc.
>
>
obligatory ted reference:
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/allison_hunt_gets_a_new_hip.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
