On 19-7-2009 21:17, Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>>   It doesn't change the fact that Linux is more secure for the average
>> user than Windows is, for the simple reason that Linux is not targetted
>> as much as Windows is.
> 
> I think he's saying the average Linux user isn't the same as the average 
> Windows user, and the average Linux's user's machine is more valuable to 
> attack. You're just measuring two different ways.
> 
A third difference is that Linux administrators of those more critical 
machines are generally more aware of threads and more knowledgeable.
<back to lurk mode for this thread>

Post a reply to this message