|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 9-5-2009 19:22, Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>> Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
>>> It's really stunning to me that everyone's picking nits and not
>>> actually commenting on the substance of what I'm saying.
>>
>> Maybe because nobody disagrees with the substance, and thus there are
>> only the small details to pick about?-)
>
> That would be cool. :-) In that case, it's probably best to start with
> "I agree with your main points, but..." That's what I try to do, as
> I've noticed people get worked up if I don't say something like that at
> the start some time.
>
> What's stunning is nobody seems to be able to shoot down the idea, since
> I haven't really thought it through very much. :-) I'd be stunned if
> there aren't fundamental flaws or missing but required features that
> this would disallow.
>
While I agree with your main points ;) it is a long time since I wrote
communication protocols and I have never had to think about security on
that communication line. ATM I don't have much free space left in my
brain for new challenges, so I can not comment on the substance.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |