nemesis wrote:
> And yet the Newscientist article fails to mention this basic Google > search at all. Suspicious... Newscientist or NewAgeScientist? :P
It wasn't a basic google search for me. It was someone else referring to the
same list, pointing to the *actual* paper about it, and then hitting the
citation cross-reference indexes to see what other scientists said about it.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
