Darren New escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> Oh, I see.  You want further proof from another skeptical.
> 
> Yes. That's called "repeatability," a fundamental property of scientific 
> theories.
> 
>> Maybe you only find many proofs from *supporters* because the 
>> scientific stabilishment don't generally enjoy researching into 
>> phenomena it can't explain and end-up with the same Scully-like 
>> conclusions as the skeptical researcher in the article?
> 
> No, actually, I found 14 different laboratories that tried and failed to 
> repeat the experiment, and one that repeated it twice, that one being 
> the homeopathy institute. And it was the same scientist repeating it 
> both times, let alone the same institute.

And yet the Newscientist article fails to mention this basic Google 
search at all.  Suspicious... Newscientist or NewAgeScientist? :P

-- 
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9

Post a reply to this message