"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
news:49f1ec38@news.povray.org...
> Now I *know* you know that's not what I meant. I've explained before -
> if you want cable-like speeds, in most markets there is a single choice.
> I can't get anything but Comcast if I want 10 Mbps without paying for a
> dedicated line. So my choice is to live with Comcast's draconian TOS or
> to use DSL - which gives me a whole 3 Mbps currently.
So Comcast should be subject to your terms because there happens to be
little alternative in your locality?
It's OK to ask or lobby for Comcast to get what you need. I don't think it's
OK at all for legislation to dictate Comcast to offer you exactly what you
want.
Post a reply to this message
|
