>> >  Something like bittorrent does not break against human rights 
>> > regarding
>> > freedom of expression and information.
>
>> What's your problem with the directive then?
>
>  ???

Just because the directive *could* be used for "government-sanctioned 
censorship", you don't think it should be allowed?  In reality it will be 
used to charge people more for high-bandwidth content, a perfectly legal and 
sound business model.

My point is, that this is at odds with your usual stance on such matters (eg 
bittorrent, just because it can be used for illegal purposes doesn't mean it 
should be made illegal).

Post a reply to this message