>> Where's the problem?
> 
>   I was talking about the logic of argumenting that limiting choice is
> increasing choice.

And, as I said, this is basic politics. Claim to be doing something for 
reason X when in fact you're doing it for reason Y.

I'm sure that at least one or two of these "green initiatives" are 
actually being implemented because they make somebody quite a lot of 
money, nothing to do with saving the plannet. Indeed, if it's making 
somebody money, it's probably _harming_ the planet...

And besides, in the strictest sense of the word, you are increasing the 
cardinality of the set of available products. You're removing the option 
everybody wants so you can replace it with lots of more expensive 
options that nobody wants. ;-)

Post a reply to this message