scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> > No company has the
> > right to actively censor information from its clients.

> What utter rubbish, if the company I work for was forced to give all 
> information to our clients we would be out of business!  A company has a 
> right to decide what information is passed on to its clients.

  You really like to taunt, don't you? I do honestly think that you
understood what I meant.

  I have to admit that you are really good at nitpicking.

> I was replying to Andrew's point, which you conveniently deleted before 
> replying...

  In the same way you ignored what he *meant* with is point and nitpicked
about the *literal* meaning of whatever he said, sidetracking to some
completely ridiculous slippery slope.

  The only way you could nitpick any worse is if you took a dictionary and
started looking for the most obscure meanings of individual words written
by people and started using that as your counter-arguments.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message