Invisible a écrit :
> Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:
>> Invisible a écrit :
>>> I did take a look at the "dot" tool - but it tends to produce utterly 
>>> horrid graphs. I mean, *astonishingly* bad graphs.
>>
>> Perhaps it would be wise, before writing such statements, to ensure 
>> that your own tool reaches at least an equivalent quality ;-)
> 
> Well, thus far my tool has succeeded in not putting nodes on top of each 
> other, and so their labels are at least readable. That's an improvement, 
> if only a small one.

Except I have no such problem with dot...

Example:

digraph "" {
node [shape=ellipse, color=lightblue, style=filled, fontname="Times-Bold"]
p1 [label="1"];
p2 [label="2"];
p3 [label="3"];
p4 [label="4"];
p5 [label="5"];
p6 [label="6"];
p7 [label="7"];
p8 [label="8"];
p9 [label="9"];

edge [color=black]
p1 -> p2
p1 -> p3
p1 -> p4
p3 -> p5
p3 -> p6
p3 -> p7
p7 -> p8
p7 -> p9
edge [color=red]
p7 -> p1
}

gives the image attached. Probably not the most terse way since I 
adapted it from a computer-generated dot file.

What's wrong?

-- 
Vincent

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'example.png' (4 KB)

Preview of image 'example.png'