Warp wrote:
>   Judging from thedailywtf.com, proprietary code isn't always much better
> either.

	Especially CAD software - excluding the huge sellers like AutoCAD.
They're actually quite powerful programs, but the documentation is
incredibly poor, and often incorrect. I remember the docs of a certain
EM simulation software giving an example of how to calculate something
that made no sense physically. And the _proper_ way to calculate it was
not in the docs.

-- 
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.


                    /\  /\               /\  /
                   /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                       >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                   anl

Post a reply to this message