|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:13:24 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009 11:15:47 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>
>>Now you're bringing logic into it -
>
> Of course, if all else fails then use logic.
LOL
>>but technically only one person could be at the 50% mark. :-)
>>
>>
> Duh? O_O
<grunt> (Oh, wait, wrong thread).
>>Like I said, I restrict my attention to the things that are important
>>and don't overload my mind. Rather than seeing the stupid billboard at
>>the side of the road, I'm having a conversation.
>>
> I don't want to get all religious about it so I'll say no more other
> than "YOU will burn in HELL" </Joke>
LOL, but really, you didn't think I'd detect the joke? I'm hurt now. ;-)
> Actually that was the way of speaking some of the ministers I had at
> school, when I was too young to walk out. Sad really.
Yeah, I know what you mean.
>>> From my understanding of the way alcohol relaxes you he must have been
>>> blotto then. That does not add up. If he was so relaxed then he would
>>> not have been able to react swiftly and correctly. I presume that he
>>> was wearing a seatbelt and in a safe car to escape serious injury.
>>
>>Ford Mondeo, and yeah, seatbelt was on. But no, having seen how he
>>drinks, he is generally pretty relaxed when stone cold sober anyways, so
>>it wouldn't have taken a lot. His account was that he was just over the
>>limit.
>
> That's what I drive so it is good to know that they are safe.
Apparently very. I still can't find what it's called in the US, though,
we don't use that name here as far as I know.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |