POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Cellular automata : Re: Cellular automata Server Time
6 Sep 2024 01:26:22 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Cellular automata  
From: [GDS|Entropy]
Date: 26 Mar 2009 15:03:29
Message: <49cbd181$1@news.povray.org>
Yes.

Check out "A new kind of science" by Stephen Wolfram.

ian

"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message 
news:49cbbde0$1@news.povray.org...
>I wonder if you could create a fractal CA?
>
> Imagine a CA, where each cell is actually 9 subcells. You apply the rules 
> to the subcells to make them live and dead. Then after each subcell 
> generation, you interpret those 9 cells to decide whether the supercell is 
> alive or dead (like, 5+ subcells alive means the supercell is alive or 
> some such), and it turns out the supercells are following the same rules 
> as the subcells.
>
> Just a curiousity triggered by earlier quantum-is-fractal link, Wolfram's 
> New Science ideas, Permutation City, and 
>
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~vpetkov/Unreasonable%20Effectiveness%20of%20Mathematics.pdf
>
> I wonder if there's a non-utterly-brute-force way of finding such a 
> patter.
>
> (First post was wrong group. :-)
> -- 
>   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
>   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.