Invisible escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> If I'm not wrong, core Haskell is about as clean and simple as plain 
>> Scheme, both based on lambda calculus.  Building upon solid, flexible 
>> and simple infrastructure is not a bad idea.
> 
> Sure. But taking a solid, flexible and simple infrastructure and making 
> it complex and convoluted isn't such a hot idea.

By simple of course we mean things that twist and bend the minds of 
common, mortal programmers.  We're just abstracting that a step further. ;)

Post a reply to this message