Chambers wrote:
> I thought it was the other way around - that the basis of our legal 
> system was "Innocent until proven guilty?"

Sorry. Braino. You're right of course.

> I don't believe you can be prosecuted for perjury unless the testimony 
> is tied to a criminal trial.

Probably true. Hence my vague idea that it had to be something to do with 
putting people in jail. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."

Post a reply to this message