|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
> > Basically, it grudgingly admits that IE8 is a little bit better in a
> > particular aspect, then dismissing it as irrelevant, where with any
> > other browser, any speed increase would be trumpeted as the greatest
> > thing since sliced breat (especially if it were for a Mac).
> Now you know how Amiga users feel. When and where the Amiga did things
> better or faster, it somehow wasn't important... until the Wintel
> platform caught up.
I *honestly* think the speed issue *is* mostly irrelevant in this case.
As I already commented, safety, stability and implementation of standards
vastly overwhelm it in importance. IE has a sad history in this area, and
it's not going to redeem itself overnight. Especially not with something
as irrelevant as being some fractions faster.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |