Warp wrote:
>   You always succeed in returning to your favorite subject: Bashing
> "unsafe" languages. And in your world there's only one such language: C++.

You know something?  It's getting "really tiresome and old" that every time 
I list problems with 5 or 6 different languages, you think I'm bashing on 
C++. It's getting "really tiresome and old" that every time I point out 
something that Windows does well, I'm told I'm bashing on Linux. It's 
getting "really tiresome and old" that every time I point out problems with 
unsafe languages in general, you think I'm bashing solely on C++. It's 
getting "really tiresome and old" that every time I talk about automatic 
resource management you think I'm bashing C++. It's getting "really tiresome 
and old" that most times you tell me I'm ignorant and I ask you for more 
information, you ignore that request, preferring just to insult me rather 
than actually provide information that might improve the conversation.

I think I've expressed my point of view, and I think you all understand what 
I'm saying but for some reason feel the need defend C++ instead of 
discussing the pros and cons rationally and conversationally. I can't add 
any further information by pursuing this conversation, altho I've left 
several questions open in various posts that could be productively answered.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."

Post a reply to this message