Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> Actually, I thought it ended in C++ because that's the only unsafe OOP
> language I know of.
I can't understand if that means "I haven't studied unsafe OOP languages
other than C++" or "to my knowledge there are no other unsafe OOP languages".
> It's the only language I know where the compiler
> attempts to enforce modularity but in practice fails to do so, by declaring
> violation of modularity "undefined" or "compiler-specific" rather than
> catching all cases of broken modularity at compile time or runtime.
Then you don't know much, do you.
> I was trying to figure out how well-documented modularity breaking is a
> "kludge" but poorly documented unsupported modularity breaking isn't.
The connection between my usage of the word "kludge" and your usage
of the words "unsafe" and "reflection" is purely your invention.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|