Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Actually, I thought it ended in C++ because that's the only unsafe OOP 
> language I know of.

  I can't understand if that means "I haven't studied unsafe OOP languages
other than C++" or "to my knowledge there are no other unsafe OOP languages".

> It's the only language I know where the compiler 
> attempts to enforce modularity but in practice fails to do so, by declaring 
> violation of modularity "undefined" or "compiler-specific" rather than 
> catching all cases of broken modularity at compile time or runtime.

  Then you don't know much, do you.

> I was trying to figure out how well-documented modularity breaking is a 
> "kludge" but poorly documented unsupported modularity breaking isn't.

  The connection between my usage of the word "kludge" and your usage
of the words "unsafe" and "reflection" is purely your invention.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message