|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> >> I'm saying that C++ does not enforce that you don't change private instance
> >> variables from outside the class.
> >
> > And this has exactly what to do with whether (compiler-enforced) data
> > hiding is a good thing or not?
> Because there's two reasons for data hiding: (1) allow more flexibility in
> implementation, (2) allow easier debugging.
> If you can violate my encapsulation, I don't see the data as especially
> encapsulated, is all.
You didn't answer my question.
"Is enforced data hiding a good thing or a bad thing?"
"In C++ you can bypass the encapsulation, so it's a bad thing."
That doesn't make any sense. Exactly how is C++ related to the subject?
You are badly derailing.
But of course. As long as you get to bash C++...
> > Every single discussion about programming with you turns into C++ bashing,
> > no matter what the subject.
> I'm happy to bash any other unsafe OO language you might want to name. :-)
It's getting really tiresome and old.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |