Warp escreveu:
> Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> Warp wrote:
>>>   Why not? Having the compiler check for breaking of agreements (eg.
>>>   "don't
>>> access these variables") is much better than oral agreements. The compiler
>>> is much better at catching mistakes than you are.
> 
>> It's an underscore or something else clearly visible in the offending
>> (= private-data-using-) code, not an oral agreement.
> 
>   Ok, "written agreement" then, if you want to nitpick. Not much difference.
> Still not enforced nor sanity-checked by anyone or anything.

Here is where Larry Wall's quote really applies. ;)

Post a reply to this message