Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> >   Why not? Having the compiler check for breaking of agreements (eg.
> >   "don't
> > access these variables") is much better than oral agreements. The compiler
> > is much better at catching mistakes than you are.

> It's an underscore or something else clearly visible in the offending
> (= private-data-using-) code, not an oral agreement.

  Ok, "written agreement" then, if you want to nitpick. Not much difference.
Still not enforced nor sanity-checked by anyone or anything.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message