Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> >   And if you don't prevent it, you are locking yourself out of ever trying
> > to improve your module (without breaking tons of existing code).

> Tons of existing code are intentionally accessing stuff they know is subject
> to change?

  I still can't comprehend what's so bad in the compiler doing the check
that you don't access the private members.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message