Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > And if you don't prevent it, you are locking yourself out of ever trying
> > to improve your module (without breaking tons of existing code).
> Tons of existing code are intentionally accessing stuff they know is subject
> to change?
I still can't comprehend what's so bad in the compiler doing the check
that you don't access the private members.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|