nemesis wrote:
> More than that, Common Lisp has CLOS:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System

Yes. I was trying to describe that it doesn't have to be built in, tho. :-) 
I like CLOS.

(I don't know if CLOS counts as "built in" or not.)

>> I don't remember scheme enough to know how clean it is, and I'll agree 
>> with you on the C part. :-)  And that's not to say there aren't things 
>> that would be very difficult to do in LISP without native support 
>> built into the language (like some forms of control flow, for example).
> 
> Are you kidding?  One of the main strenghts of Lisp is its macro system.

Didn't I say that? :-)

> http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/index.html#pure-oo

Cool. Thanks for that.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."

Post a reply to this message