|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> More than that, Common Lisp has CLOS:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System
Yes. I was trying to describe that it doesn't have to be built in, tho. :-)
I like CLOS.
(I don't know if CLOS counts as "built in" or not.)
>> I don't remember scheme enough to know how clean it is, and I'll agree
>> with you on the C part. :-) And that's not to say there aren't things
>> that would be very difficult to do in LISP without native support
>> built into the language (like some forms of control flow, for example).
>
> Are you kidding? One of the main strenghts of Lisp is its macro system.
Didn't I say that? :-)
> http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/index.html#pure-oo
Cool. Thanks for that.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
unable to read this, even at arm's length."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |