clipka wrote:
> stbenge <^@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> At the risk of missing the point entirely and/or saying something
>> stupid, I present this code:
> 
> You're *not* missing the point; in fact, from a quick glance at the code this
> one seems to perfectly hit the mark:
> 
>> // read from array into a pigment

It's the best way I know. An in-POV-editable df3 pattern would be 
better, if such a thing existed.

> Asked for a smart solution - got one as it seems; thanks a lot!

I usually try to help - don't always succeed; you're welcome! ;)

Sam

Post a reply to this message