|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Mike wrote:
> Not sure if you did this with the merge command or without.
attached are my images for
1. one sphere
2. two spheres with union
3. two spheres with merge
I also get a wrong result for the union, although it
is not as glaringly obvious as in the merge case ;)
Also, I tried to reconstruct your rectangle test scene based
on you original posting and the described modifications. For
me, the line went away (in the merge case) after replacing
box{<-1.899, 3,-1.899000001>,<1.899000001,5,1.899000001>
with
box{<-1.899000001, 3,-1.899000001>,<1.899000001,5,1.899000001>
I wanted to add "using 3.6.1c", but I just noticed it actually
says 3.6.1a in the about dialog ;) However, that should mostly
concern the editor according to the download page.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'single.jpg' (11 KB)
Download 'double_union.jpg' (11 KB)
Download 'double_merge.jpg' (13 KB)
Preview of image 'single.jpg'
![single.jpg](/povray.general/attachment/%3C49b3b0d5%40news.povray.org%3E/single.jpg?preview=1)
Preview of image 'double_union.jpg'
![double_union.jpg](/povray.general/attachment/%3C49b3b0d5%40news.povray.org%3E/double_union.jpg?preview=1)
Preview of image 'double_merge.jpg'
![double_merge.jpg](/povray.general/attachment/%3C49b3b0d5%40news.povray.org%3E/double_merge.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |