Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Basically, if you actually use a closure (rather than a downward funarg), 
> you wind up with undefined behavior. I'm sorry to say, that means C++'s 
> lambdas suck, and technically aren't even lambda expressions.

  You have embarked in a holy quest to prove that C++ will not have "true"
lambda functions, and for that reason it sucks. In fact, it seems that you
have started a holy war against C++ right now. Whatever it takes to prove
that it sucks.

  Now that you have "proven" that C++ will not have "true" lambda functions,
you must be exhilarated.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message