POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Standard libraries : Re: Standard libraries Server Time
6 Sep 2024 11:18:41 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Standard libraries  
From: Darren New
Date: 5 Mar 2009 11:30:41
Message: <49affe31$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:
> scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
>>> Haskell's array libraries... are a mess. Specifically, there is now about 
>>> half a dozen of them.
> 
>> Not so different with C and all its derivatives (C++, C++ STL, C++ .net), 
>> there are many different array handling "libraries", fun if you work with 
>> code that uses all sorts of different approaches :-)
> 
>   Really? C has no array handling libraries whatsoever (standard C, that is).

#include <string.h>
technically speaking. :-)

And you'd have to count malloc() and free() and memset() and all that stuff. 
It's not especially sophisticated, mind, but that counts, doesn't it?

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.