On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:21:01 +0100, Fredrik Eriksson wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:37:20 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>> No. They have all the master passwords; I don't even know what those
>>>> are. So they can lock me out, but not the reverse.
>>>  If you have the passwords for the routers, then you have the
>>> passwords. :-)
>>
>> But I *don't* have the passwords for the routers.
> 
> If you have physical access to the routers, then you make the passwords.
> 
> 
>>> Seriously. You should write up what's going on and send it to your
>>> boss, his boss, and so on up the line. Explain they're crashing your
>>> systems and you have no control over it, and ask them what the
>>> appropriate procedure should be for violation of procedures.
>>
>> Nobody will care. If I say "they did X, which caused a problem",
>> everybody will assume I don't know what I'm talking about.
> 
> It does not matter what they assume or even what they choose to do about
> it. What matters is creating a paper trail to cover your own ass.

Exactly what I was going to say.

Andy, write the damn paper trail already!

Jim

Post a reply to this message