clipka <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> >   If you make a habit of creating a sphere, you are only going to encounter
> > problems which a sky_sphere doesn't have.

> .... which would be...?

1) A sphere makes the rendering slower. For each single traced ray (all of
   them, not just camera rays) povray has to test it against the sphere.
   A sphere may be fast to trace, but when you have to test against it for
   each single traced ray, the small times add up.
   A sky_sphere doesn't need to be traced, and if it suffices, it eliminates
   the useless overhead.

2) Light sources in your scene might interact in undesired ways with your
   sphere, even if you specify an "ambient 1" for it. If light sources have
   an effect on the sphere, it not only can change the illumination/coloration
   of the sphere, but objects might also cast shadows onto it. A sky_sphere
   will always look the same regardless of your light sources.

3) You don't need to worry about fog and media effects with sky_sphere, but
   you have to if you use a sphere.

4) Objects which are large enough might intersect with the sphere. Even if
   they don't, if they are large enough and eg. reflective, the reflection
   might become wrong.

5) If you move the camera too far from the center of the sphere, the sphere
   texturing may look distorted in an undesired way.

6) If you use things like ground fog, the sphere limits its visibility and
   might make this boundary visible. sky_sphere doesn't limit anything.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message